Headlines
KU Law reports graduate employment over 90% for seventh consecutive year
LAWRENCE – The University of Kansas School of Law reported graduate employment over 90% for the seventh consecutive year. Overall employment for the KU Law Class of 2020 was 93.1%, according to data released by the American Bar Association. KU Law is among the top quarter of law schools nationwide for overall employment within 10 months of graduation, compared with all ABA-accredited law schools.
Audit committees benefit from including experts with accounting experience, study finds
LAWRENCE — A University of Kansas professor of business is the co-author of “Audit Committee Accounting Expertise and the Mitigation of Strategic Auditor Behavior,” which proposes such expertise helps reduce information irregularities between the auditor and the client, thereby limiting auditors’ ability to over-audit and under-audit. The study is published in The Accounting Review.
Full stories below.
————————————————————————
Contact: Margaret Hair, School of Law, 785-864-9205, [email protected], @kulawschool
KU Law reports graduate employment over 90% for seventh consecutive year
LAWRENCE – The University of Kansas School of Law reported graduate employment over 90% for the seventh consecutive year.
Overall employment for the KU Law Class of 2020 was 93.1%, according to data released by the American Bar Association. KU Law is among the top quarter of law schools nationwide for overall employment within 10 months of graduation, compared with all ABA-accredited law schools.
More than 83% of KU Law graduates in 2020 landed best jobs – defined as full-time, long-term law jobs that require bar exam passage or where a juris doctor offers an advantage. A recent Law.com report places KU Law in the top third nationally for full-time jobs that require bar passage.
“We are encouraged that, even in a year seriously impacted by the global health pandemic, our students still achieved excellent employment outcomes,” said Heather Spielmaker, assistant dean for career services at KU Law. “High-caliber instruction and classroom preparation help create graduates who are confident and competent, and that clearly resonates well with our employers.”
The legal news outlet Above the Law recently included KU Law in its 2021 Top 50 Law School Rankings. The rankings, which place KU Law at 44th – focus primarily on positive employment outcomes, low education cost and low graduate debt.
KU Law ranks as the No. 19 Best Value Law School in the country, according to National Jurist magazine. That ranking, released in the fall, highlights affordable law schools whose graduates perform well on the bar exam and have had success finding legal jobs. National Jurist ranks the top 20 schools and assigns a letter grade to 40 additional honorees.
“We are pleased that KU Law is included in these rankings that focus on outcomes and value for our students,” said Stephen Mazza, dean and professor of law. “At KU Law, we know that value isn’t just about reasonable tuition. It is about our graduates securing quality jobs and passing the bar exam at a rate that routinely exceeds the state average.”
During the 2020 calendar year, 91% of first-time test takers from KU Law passed the bar exam. In the two states where most KU Law graduates take the exam, 91.1% passed the Kansas Bar Exam and 94.4% passed the Missouri Bar Exam. KU Law’s Free Bar Prep Program offers a post-graduate Themis Bar Review course to students at no cost.
Employment data for KU and all ABA-accredited law schools is available on the ABA website. Visit the KU Law website for an infographic with complete Class of 2020 employment data.
-30-
————————————————————————
The official university Twitter account has changed to @UnivOfKansas.
Refollow @KUNews for KU News Service stories, discoveries and experts.
Tweets by KUnews
————————————————————————
Contact: Jon Niccum, KU News Service, 785-864-7633, [email protected]
Audit committees benefit from including experts with accounting experience, study finds
LAWRENCE — It seems like common sense that an audit committee might want to include individuals who have accounting experience. That’s not always the case.
“It’s not necessarily that auditors are acting nefariously when they over-audit. It’s just that people respond to incentives, and auditors have an incentive to protect their reputations and avoid inspection findings,” said Mike Wilkins, the Larry D. Horner and KPMG Professor of Accounting at the University of Kansas.
His article “Audit Committee Accounting Expertise and the Mitigation of Strategic Auditor Behavior” proposes such expertise helps reduce information irregularities between the auditor and the client, thereby limiting auditors’ ability to over-audit and under-audit. The study is published in The Accounting Review.
“All of these organizations have audit committees. If you truly are interested in trying to ensure that the quality of the audit work is what you want it to be, it’s really important you have the right type of individuals on the committee,” said Wilkins, who co-wrote the article with James Hansen, Ling Lei Lisic and Timothy Seidel.
Wilkins’ team conducted tests using three different settings: two associated with over-auditing and one associated with under-auditing. The study reveals that when audit committees have accounting expertise, clients: 1) pay lower fees when changes in standards decrease required audit effort; 2) pay a smaller fee premium when material weaknesses are remediated; and 3) have a reduced likelihood of restatement when audit market competition is high.
“There’s a tendency for auditors, particularly in large firms who are inspected every year, to over-audit,” he said.
“This is to make sure they’re doing things as well as they’re able to at all times, when you could have instances where maybe some of the extra work they’re doing is not entirely necessary. One of the jobs of the audit committee is to monitor the auditors. Technically, it’s an active role, but it’s not like the committee is physically there actually watching what the auditor is doing.”
The research relies on the concept of credence goods, which are defined as those with qualities that are difficult or impossible to evaluate even after a purchase has occurred.
For comparison, Wilkins uses the analogy of someone who needs to get their car repaired.
“You take your car in, and the person who is repairing your car is the expert. They also are the party who is selling you the service. You’re not the expert. You can’t observe what they’re doing. Even if you could, you might not have any idea whether the work is good or not. So you have to trust them to explain what you need and to charge you honestly for it,” he said.
Similarly, an audit committee is not watching someone audit everything. But if the committee contains a person with accounting expertise, then collectively this group should comprehend more about what is actually needed.
“Plus, the auditor obviously knows who’s on the committee,” Wilkins said. “So if the auditor knows that some of the committee members are accounting experts, then he might be less likely to over-audit or not audit enough.”
Why wouldn’t companies consider including accounting experts on their audit committees?
“I don’t think it’s likely they actively would avoid it. It’s just that they might not understand the benefit of having someone on there who has accounting expertise verses other types of financial expertise,” said Wilkins, an expert in auditing research who came to KU in 2017.
Among the interesting revelations in his study is the results in certain situations apply more for smaller firms than for the Big Four accounting firms (Deloitte, Ernst & Young, KPMG and PwC).
“Auditors work hard to uphold their reputation. That is a very strong incentive from their perspective,” he said.
“But smaller audit firms are generally less monitored by factors related to litigation and reputation. So it’s even more important in those situations that the audit committee is working toward doing what it needs to be doing.”
Wilkins hopes this paper yields both academic and practical implications.
He said, “What our results show here is that — particularly for companies that are not audited by the large audit firms — it really adds a lot of value to have somebody on the audit committee with significant accounting experience.”
-30-
————————————————————————
KU News Service
1450 Jayhawk Blvd.
Lawrence KS 66045
Phone: 785-864-3256
Fax: 785-864-3339
[email protected]
http://www.news.ku.edu
Erinn Barcomb-Peterson, director of news and media relations, [email protected]
Today’s News is a free service from the Office of Public Affairs
